A Review of Jeanne Hoffman by Jesse Garon Parsons

Monday, March 31, 2008


The following review was sent to me by Jesse Garon Parsons. As you know ArtHeat welcomes submissions, especially of decent quality like this one:

If you're one of those fervently religious (usually American) people who is able to see images of Jesus in your burnt toast, then you might like Jeanne Hoffman's Strange things travel with you, currently on view at whatiftheworld gallery. I say this because believing that there is anything compelling to be seen beneath the charred crumbs of this burnt-out show requires a leap of faith not possible for the rationally minded among us.

Perhaps I am being too harsh. Allow me to begin again.

Stumble off the sweating asphalt into whatiftheworld gallery, parched and wilting, searching for artistic sustenance, and brother let me tell you, this little confection of a show will quench your thirst - assuming that your body is sustained by moonbeams, pixie dust, and the dreams of children. That is to say, this show is bound to mend your heart and moisten your dreams - as long as you're a thirteen year old girl. It's just all so damn adorable, the only thing missing is a stuffed unicorn, or maybe a poster of some kittens peeking out a gingham-wrapped picnic basket.

Pink is a recurring color, a giant string of pearls figures prominently, and the adjectives cute, squiggly, and/or supercute!!;) apply to most everything in the show. The supercute, squiggly drawings that line the walls are endearing in the same way that child prostitutes are - they're roughly finished, sketchy, a bit tattered, washed out, not terribly sophisticated, and they look like they might have been accidents - but at least they're working for a living. Well, I suppose the drawings are working, but they might need a few more years to mature before they can really get the job done. Some are punctuated by diaristic confessions covering such topics as the excessive consumption of wine (surprise, surprise), fleas, and kidney infection. Who, other than Hoffman's urologist (or possibly her veterinarian), needs access to such information? Apparently the art-show-going public, that's who.

The artist wants to think of everything in the show, including sculptures, as a sort of drawing. Valid. Cute even. But drawings in space, as the artist calls them, may also be known, to grown ups not on intimate terms with their bongs, as sculptures. Near the center of the room hovers a large brown cloud sculpture made of thousands of twist ties. Below it dangle hundreds of brown, red, and pink clay droplets. Aside from invoking a ghostly feeling of carpal tunnel syndrome in my wrists (what mindless, pathetic souls were conned into twisting all those damn things together, anyway?), the cloud made me wonder: is this a cry for help? Is Jeanne a cutter, or perhaps just sad? The bloody tear/rain drops would suggest as much. Were all these quirky little doodle drawings just an elaborate ruse, meant to deflect attention from whatever malady caused the artist to conjure up a storm of blood droplets? Does the viewer care? That all depends on your level of emotional investment in the show thus far. I walked on by, absentmindedly rubbing my wrists.

Beneath this cloudy (potential) cry for help are scattered a few bulbous, organic forms, looking something like genitals of the gods which have been hacked off and semi-lovingly repurposed as sculptures. Some are wrapped in layers of fabric, yarn, or packing tape (or maybe that was actually an oddly shaped package waiting to be shipped...hard to tell with this show). Others are sort of painted, and still others are seemingly just tossed on the floor half baked, as if Jeanne got tired of the whole "making art that has some level of finish and formal quality" charade. You know what, Jeanne? I get tired of it too. Let us once and for all dispense with that level of aesthetic contemplation that differentiates us from apes with paintbrushes. Pull your opposable thumbs out of your collective ass, Art World. Cerebral is out. Jesus-in-the-burnt-toast? So cute right now.

Oh yeah, I forgot - there's also a poorly-knit scarf on display. Your guess is as good as mine.

After the Fresh Meat fiasco, that's two strikes in a row for whatiftheworld. Whatthefuck? might be more appropriate.

Labels: ,

12 Comments:

Anonymous Krishna in my cornflakes said...

Robert, I must disagree with you here. This review is of poor quality, and doesn't seem able to engage with the work on any mature level at all. Notice how much time and energy (and space) has been devoted to unnecessary bits of metaphor and comparison. The review comes across as more of a pissed-off, failed and jealous artist than an individual capable of exploring a Master's-level show with critical analysis and insight.

Personally, I liked the show, and can see how others might not like it though. But whether you enjoy the work or not, I am concerned about the Grade 2 review it got on Artheat.

Jeanne Hoffman, take this review from whence it comes and ignore it. I wouldn't trust a reviewer who starts off slagging an artist and then claims "Perhaps I am being too harsh. Allow me to begin again" only to continue slagging them off in the very next paragraph. I wouldn't trust that reviewer further than I can see up a camel's arse at midnight.

I think the real leap of faith needed here is in justifying Jesse Garon Parson's review being posted as an Artheat article, and not a tacky comment!

7:29 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Whatthefuck?" is a superb name for a gallery! I like art that is mysterious and makes me wonder.

7:52 PM  
Anonymous Telephone service said...

The review says more about the reviewer than the work...

9:31 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This lady knows shit about art. The basic assumption of her piece is that art is crap unless it is beautifully made, and concepts count for nothing. I'd be interested to know what she thinks is good. Probably photorealistic paintings of flower arrangements.

10:48 PM  
Anonymous Gordon said...

Jesse Parsons seems bothered by the enigma in the work. Shame, she didn't even get past the knitted scarf. Does Parsons need each work to have a reason or a meaning?

It's a bit like walking into a forest and expecting the trees to justify their being there - enjoy the work for what it is, and appreciate that it holds a few secrets.

11:33 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

i haven't come across your work before, Jesse. Please could you give us a few examples of other reviews you have done?

8:07 AM  
Anonymous f.b. said...

Jesse Parsons is so bad ass, I heard that they (it's actually two of them and they talk in riddles to people at the traffic lights in hout bay and sell soap) fill up with petrol the day after the price hike instead of before like everyone else.And they milk cats. That sort of rebellious ingenuity really scares me, and they scare me, and if I wasn't so scared I'd call them stupid twats for writings such a kak review. You suck, you suuuuuuck!

9:45 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I guess it's safe to say there won't be too many submissions of 'decent quality' reviews any time soon.

5:48 PM  
Anonymous JD said...

what utter drivel. no major departure for artheat then.

all hail brenden gray.

5:49 PM  
Anonymous ted said...

brendon gravy

10:27 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

maybe its only me, but i see an asshole in the toast. showing signs of a vicious hernia attack.

11:43 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think it's a pretty damn valid review actually.

2:50 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home






Not Listed? Email me:

What's New on Ed Young's Diary


What's New on Mixtape



What's New on Its Not a Tumor



What's New on Work In Progress




    Follow me on Twitter
    Afrigator View RSS feed Technorati Profile