The Shitty Week Part 2
Monday, May 12, 2008
I'm sure by now you have some inkling of the content and process of Zander Blom's work, there has been a load of not undeserved hype. My contribution will be to say that it was a thoroughly depressing offering. It wasn't short of beauty, the prints were interesting, visually rich and impeccably executed. Nor was it short of intelligence, depth or wit. It was depressing in that it contained most of the elements of depression: self-reflection, disappointment and futility. Depression isn't necessarily a bad emotion to be getting out of a work, it's just depressing.
Self-reflection is the worst. It's when you start asking stupid questions, the kinds that don't have answers. Like "What does it mean to make art?", and "What does art mean?" or even "What does Modernism mean?" These questions form the basis of Zander's work, in various and more complex forms. These questions have been asked for years, and the answer is the basis for countless works, but is still ultimately elusive. This is the disappointment: you can't break down those questions by breaking down art. If you strip art of meaning, try to find it's basic components, you inevitably create new meaning, you reference the past attempts at the same. Our minds have been colonised by Modern art to the extent that even trying is a reference. Irony is the last refuge: playing this game on purpose to try and negate it, outrun it. But even irony is just disappointed wit.
Finally, futility. What's the purpose of spending four years building a body of work to only come to the conclusions above? Well, this is where Zander has got it right. If you don't try, you'll never know.
Self-reflection is the worst. It's when you start asking stupid questions, the kinds that don't have answers. Like "What does it mean to make art?", and "What does art mean?" or even "What does Modernism mean?" These questions form the basis of Zander's work, in various and more complex forms. These questions have been asked for years, and the answer is the basis for countless works, but is still ultimately elusive. This is the disappointment: you can't break down those questions by breaking down art. If you strip art of meaning, try to find it's basic components, you inevitably create new meaning, you reference the past attempts at the same. Our minds have been colonised by Modern art to the extent that even trying is a reference. Irony is the last refuge: playing this game on purpose to try and negate it, outrun it. But even irony is just disappointed wit.
Finally, futility. What's the purpose of spending four years building a body of work to only come to the conclusions above? Well, this is where Zander has got it right. If you don't try, you'll never know.
Labels: Zander Blom





